yes, aggregate data is useful for analysis in many ways, that’s clear without the need to get as excited as the article’s authors seem to be. but Quantified Us just sounds so wrong, treating the individual as a data-cow for the Greater Data. No thanks. First help me understand and analyse my own data so I can benefit from it, then talk about sharing….
We’re more than mere consumers, and business should remember that | Guardian Sustainable Business | The Guardian Unsurprisingly and as Doc Searls and Cluetrain gang have been saying for years: “…an overwhelming majority had a [...] […]
‘The Cloud’ and Other Dangerous Metaphors – The Atlantic A nice philosophical discourse about data – doesn’t fix it but draws attention to the right things, the personal and human nature of data, the [...] […]
Mark Cuban Vs. The World: Billionaire Defends Controversial Comments On Health Care – Forbes yeah, another go at Mark Cuban. My question is.. why only every 3 months? Surely a monthly blood test would [...] […]
Mark Cuban Doesn’t Understand Health Care – Forbes this does sound like a clash of two worlds/mindsets. to anyone within QS movement the suggestion makes perfect sense. Surprised that Mark Cuban didn’t use any [...] […]