-
Networked Knowledge and Combinatorial Creativity | Brain Pickings
Well, found it a bit – let’s throw vaguely related stuff at the wall and hope it sticks. Not for me, sorry.
TAGS: None
tags: philosophy artificial intelligence david deutsch science AI self-awareness
Networked Knowledge and Combinatorial Creativity | Brain Pickings
Well, found it a bit – let’s throw vaguely related stuff at the wall and hope it sticks. Not for me, sorry.
tags: Creativity Knowledge ideas
Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.
TAGS: None
London QS meetup group - Quantified Self and Self-hacking community in London
The Mine! project - user-driven app for data & relationship logistics
MINT - My Information, Not Theirs, market RIOT initiative to get customer data back from companies
VRM Hub - VRM community in London
VRM Labs - network of companies interested in VRM
Admin Advertising Articles & interviews Autonomy Books Business Communication Current Affairs Data Enterprise 2.0 Events Film Food and Drink Funny Identity Individual Information Journalism Marketing Media Metablogging Mine! Music Network New models Open source/IP/DRM People Personal Personal Informatics Politics Privacy & Security Projects Public relations Quotes Reading & Bookmarks Science Social web Stuff Sui Generis Tools and applications Travel Trends Uncategorized VRM VRMHub Web/Tech Weblogs
© 2009 Media Influencer. All Rights Reserved.
This blog is powered by Wordpress and Magatheme by Bryan Helmig.
Dave Walker
on Nov 11th, 2012
@ 14:09 pm:
Ah, AI; it’s always 20 years away.
Over the last few years, I’ve come to think that Clarke may have been more prescient than may be generally appreciated; before Artificial Intelligence comes Artificial Stupidity, as we know, but if Artificial Intelligence can be achieved, the question arises as to whether it can be assured to be benign. Depending on how Artificial Intelligence it to be constructed, there may well be a risk of Artificial Insanity (as per HAL), Artificial Criminality, and a whole further raft of “configuration disorders” similar to mental illnesses in humans and higher-functioning animals. After all, as poor HAL concluded, when put in certain kind of high-stakes double- (or multiple-) bind, the only logical course of behaviour may indeed be to go mad. It’s worth noting that Asimov’s Laws of Robotics don’t necessarily act to prevent an AI going mad, only to reduce the risk of there being harmful consequences to a mad AI’s actions…
Jonathan
on Nov 15th, 2012
@ 17:14 pm:
Started out as interesting, then I ended up reading it in the voice of Sheldon (BBTheory)