TAGS: None
Rethinking the Computer at 80 – Killing the computer to save it NYTimes.com
tags: network computer nytimes neumann complexity simplicity security DARPA research future hierarchy
Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.
TAGS: None
London QS meetup group - Quantified Self and Self-hacking community in London
The Mine! project - user-driven app for data & relationship logistics
MINT - My Information, Not Theirs, market RIOT initiative to get customer data back from companies
VRM Hub - VRM community in London
VRM Labs - network of companies interested in VRM
Admin Advertising Articles & interviews Autonomy Books Business Communication Current Affairs Data Enterprise 2.0 Events Film Food and Drink Funny Identity Individual Information Journalism Marketing Media Metablogging Mine! Music Network New models Open source/IP/DRM People Personal Personal Informatics Politics Privacy & Security Projects Public relations Quotes Reading & Bookmarks Science Social web Stuff Sui Generis Tools and applications Travel Trends Uncategorized VRM VRMHub Web/Tech Weblogs
© 2009 Media Influencer. All Rights Reserved.
This blog is powered by Wordpress and Magatheme by Bryan Helmig.
Dave Walker
on Nov 11th, 2012
@ 14:31 pm:
I reached a similar conclusion some months ago, particularly in the context of network protocols.
Looking at the vast array of communications protocols which sit on top of a basic Layer 2 IP stack these days, I can’t help but think “if ‘The Network is the Computer’, then right now it looks like a VAX”.
OK, 11 years at Sun dies hard, but I can’t help but be struck by the number of protocols which do pretty much the same thing – or which can have their tails twisted, to do pretty much the same thing – just in slightly different ways. As well as the obvious examples (such as remote graphical display, where you can choose between X11, RDP, ICA, VNC, ALP, AIP, etc…) at lower levels, there’s matters of distributed naming services (DNS, LDAP etc) where IPv6 can potentially change the rules.
So, there’s a rationalisation needed – and IPv6 can change the Universe in sufficient ways that some of the compromises which were made (whether implicitly or explicitly) as a result of the nature of IPv4 can be changed. Just as RISC arose as a response to some of the shortcomings of the VAX architecture, I think we’re on the edge of something fundamental, in networking – and the proliferation of would-be de-facto standards in the Cloud space strikes me as symptomatic of it…