<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2010-01-13</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2010/01/links-for-2010-01-13/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2010/01/links-for-2010-01-13/</link>
	<description>helping people break out of pigeonholes since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:15:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Mowles</title>
		<link>http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2010/01/links-for-2010-01-13/comment-page-1/#comment-11420</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mowles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2010/01/links-for-2010-01-13/#comment-11420</guid>
		<description>You talk about &#039;the system&#039; as though it were separate from the people who participate in it, like some kind of metaphysical force. Without the people, there is no &#039;system&#039;. The individual contributes to the &#039;system&#039; and is formed by it both at the same time. We are constrained by others and dependent on them at the same time. 

It is difficult to understand what your philosophical position is, but it appears as though you think individuals can act and exist independent of other people. This form of thinking is only possible in the late 20th/early 21st C because we are convinced that somehow we are separate individuals.

The question remains how we can participate with others to create better &#039;systems&#039; which affect us all. there is no stepping outside, and little point in complaining without acting.
Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You talk about &#8216;the system&#8217; as though it were separate from the people who participate in it, like some kind of metaphysical force. Without the people, there is no &#8217;system&#8217;. The individual contributes to the &#8217;system&#8217; and is formed by it both at the same time. We are constrained by others and dependent on them at the same time. </p>
<p>It is difficult to understand what your philosophical position is, but it appears as though you think individuals can act and exist independent of other people. This form of thinking is only possible in the late 20th/early 21st C because we are convinced that somehow we are separate individuals.</p>
<p>The question remains how we can participate with others to create better &#8217;systems&#8217; which affect us all. there is no stepping outside, and little point in complaining without acting.<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adriana</title>
		<link>http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2010/01/links-for-2010-01-13/comment-page-1/#comment-11417</link>
		<dc:creator>Adriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2010/01/links-for-2010-01-13/#comment-11417</guid>
		<description>Oh, _I_ am interested in coming up with an alternative - not the critique! It&#039;s a review of a book, which sounds interesting, not a solution to the world&#039;s problems! 

I have been thinking about disruption and organisational systems for some time and am frustrated with the existing corporate structures and practices.

If you want to know more about my position and why I said it was vague because it doesn&#039;t say which direction to look at - I think it needs to the individual and his autonomy vis-a-vis system. 

For more see here: http://www.mediainfluencer.net/writings/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, _I_ am interested in coming up with an alternative &#8211; not the critique! It&#8217;s a review of a book, which sounds interesting, not a solution to the world&#8217;s problems! </p>
<p>I have been thinking about disruption and organisational systems for some time and am frustrated with the existing corporate structures and practices.</p>
<p>If you want to know more about my position and why I said it was vague because it doesn&#8217;t say which direction to look at &#8211; I think it needs to the individual and his autonomy vis-a-vis system. </p>
<p>For more see here: <a href="http://www.mediainfluencer.net/writings/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mediainfluencer.net/writings/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Mowles</title>
		<link>http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2010/01/links-for-2010-01-13/comment-page-1/#comment-11415</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mowles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2010/01/links-for-2010-01-13/#comment-11415</guid>
		<description>So what was vague about it, and why does a critique also need to come up with a viable alternative?
Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what was vague about it, and why does a critique also need to come up with a viable alternative?<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 第三天：google将从“中国四大发明”学“道”？ &#124; 文通博客</title>
		<link>http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2010/01/links-for-2010-01-13/comment-page-1/#comment-11414</link>
		<dc:creator>第三天：google将从“中国四大发明”学“道”？ &#124; 文通博客</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2010/01/links-for-2010-01-13/#comment-11414</guid>
		<description>[...] Posted by kaise at 12:04    links for 2010-01-13 « Media Influencer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted by kaise at 12:04    links for 2010-01-13 « Media Influencer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

