Media Influencer

helping people break out of pigeonholes since 2003

links for 2008-04-30

TAGS: None

TAGS: None

4 Responses to “links for 2008-04-30”


  1. Peter Parkes
    on May 1st, 2008
    @ 11:37 am

    Inverted commas laden with implication there – I take your point, though; I’m not suggesting that organisations will use Twitter for anything other than furthering their own goals (ultimately) but then that’s what they’re there for, right?

    To suggest that indivduals don’t ‘message’, though, is naïve, surely? Where do you draw the line between P2P conversations and P2P marketing?


  2. Adriana
    on May 1st, 2008
    @ 11:47 am

    Well, most of this blog is about how companies are not capable of communicating and addressing this issue. In the world where individuals can read/write, a company cannot communicate as a collective entity. Only individuals can communicate. So if companies want to communicate they have to do so as individuals – ‘fracturing’ their brands etc. Without that, they are just ‘messaging’, i.e. broadcasting (press releases, marketing campaigns, etc)

    And I am not sure what you mean by P2P marketing, sounds like another buzzword to me.


  3. Adriana
    on May 2nd, 2008
    @ 10:51 am

    Peter, just came across the post I did some time ago that deals with the ‘messaging’:
    http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2007/08/a-message-to-marketers/


  4. Peter Parkes
    on May 4th, 2008
    @ 16:18 pm

    I don’t think messaging’s inherently bad – conversation is better, but there are plenty of reasons why you might want to differentiate between the two; this is part of the reasoning behind creating a corporate Twitter account.

    P2P marketing is what you do when you’re talking about your consulting services to someone else :)

Leave a Reply

© 2009 Media Influencer. All Rights Reserved.

This blog is powered by Wordpress and Magatheme by Bryan Helmig.