<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OpenSocial &#8211; more social than open</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2007/11/opensocial-more-social-than-open/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2007/11/opensocial-more-social-than-open/</link>
	<description>helping people break out of pigeonholes since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 17:30:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google local government event &#171; News from a Nerd</title>
		<link>http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2007/11/opensocial-more-social-than-open/comment-page-1/#comment-11013</link>
		<dc:creator>Google local government event &#171; News from a Nerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2007/11/opensocial-more-social-than-open/#comment-11013</guid>
		<description>[...] The former lets you access your contacts and friends data across different social networks.  As Adriana Lukas has pointed out in the past there are limitations &#8211; Open Social still doesn&#8217;t allow me [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The former lets you access your contacts and friends data across different social networks.  As Adriana Lukas has pointed out in the past there are limitations &#8211; Open Social still doesn&#8217;t allow me [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Who Owns You? : Tomas Kohl</title>
		<link>http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2007/11/opensocial-more-social-than-open/comment-page-1/#comment-1909</link>
		<dc:creator>Who Owns You? : Tomas Kohl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 02:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2007/11/opensocial-more-social-than-open/#comment-1909</guid>
		<description>[...] comes in (if I understand it correctly). Whether it&#8217;s open enough at this time is rather another question. I appreciate the step in the right direction, and at the same time keep asking: how about our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] comes in (if I understand it correctly). Whether it&#8217;s open enough at this time is rather another question. I appreciate the step in the right direction, and at the same time keep asking: how about our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roland Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2007/11/opensocial-more-social-than-open/comment-page-1/#comment-970</link>
		<dc:creator>Roland Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2007/11/opensocial-more-social-than-open/#comment-970</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little late to the party on this one, but a read of the OpenSocial API suggests that user access to &quot;their&quot; data, at least the ability to export their graph adjacencies, is exactly what the People Data API portion of OpenSocial provides.

Obviously access is subject to access-control by the site operator, and no doubt extensive graph duplication would get noticed (most existing site operators aren&#039;t likely to permit access by unregistered applications) and may get stopped, but the rudiments are there; there&#039;s enough API to gain realistic control, at least where site operators will permit it.

The &quot;site operators&quot; can, of course, be bloggers (in the broad sense; anyone with a blogger.com account...); why shouldn&#039;t WordPress, MoveableType, etc. implement OpenSocial?

(Once that&#039;s happened, and setting aside a chicken and egg problem, there&#039;s data there for vendors - who aren&#039;t affiliated with site operations - to be granted controlled access to as part of commerce. Baby steps.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little late to the party on this one, but a read of the OpenSocial API suggests that user access to &#8220;their&#8221; data, at least the ability to export their graph adjacencies, is exactly what the People Data API portion of OpenSocial provides.</p>
<p>Obviously access is subject to access-control by the site operator, and no doubt extensive graph duplication would get noticed (most existing site operators aren&#8217;t likely to permit access by unregistered applications) and may get stopped, but the rudiments are there; there&#8217;s enough API to gain realistic control, at least where site operators will permit it.</p>
<p>The &#8220;site operators&#8221; can, of course, be bloggers (in the broad sense; anyone with a blogger.com account&#8230;); why shouldn&#8217;t WordPress, MoveableType, etc. implement OpenSocial?</p>
<p>(Once that&#8217;s happened, and setting aside a chicken and egg problem, there&#8217;s data there for vendors &#8211; who aren&#8217;t affiliated with site operations &#8211; to be granted controlled access to as part of commerce. Baby steps.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alecm</title>
		<link>http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2007/11/opensocial-more-social-than-open/comment-page-1/#comment-953</link>
		<dc:creator>alecm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2007/11/opensocial-more-social-than-open/#comment-953</guid>
		<description>oops, i must have made a slight typo; it should read:

there is nothing to prevent an architecture which is capable of distribution [from being *implemented*] in a wholly or partly centralised matter, as a convenience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops, i must have made a slight typo; it should read:</p>
<p>there is nothing to prevent an architecture which is capable of distribution [from being *implemented*] in a wholly or partly centralised matter, as a convenience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: broadstuff</title>
		<link>http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2007/11/opensocial-more-social-than-open/comment-page-1/#comment-952</link>
		<dc:creator>broadstuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2007/11/opensocial-more-social-than-open/#comment-952</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Gunpowder, Treason and....Pizza?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Its Friday night, and the weekend approaches - so what does a gentleman do in London Town? Thats right, he goes across town in the rain and dark, and approaches a dark dive deep in a basement - but not to partake of the sins of the flesh. No, dear read...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Gunpowder, Treason and&#8230;.Pizza?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Its Friday night, and the weekend approaches &#8211; so what does a gentleman do in London Town? Thats right, he goes across town in the rain and dark, and approaches a dark dive deep in a basement &#8211; but not to partake of the sins of the flesh. No, dear read&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
