<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The hard-line opinions of journalists are no substitute for the patient fact-finding of bloggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2007/08/the-hard-line-opinions-of-journalists-are-no-substitute-for-the-patient-fact-finding-of-bloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2007/08/the-hard-line-opinions-of-journalists-are-no-substitute-for-the-patient-fact-finding-of-bloggers/</link>
	<description>helping people break out of pigeonholes since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:15:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: One Man &#38; His Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2007/08/the-hard-line-opinions-of-journalists-are-no-substitute-for-the-patient-fact-finding-of-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>One Man &#38; His Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 08:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2007/08/the-hard-line-opinions-of-journalists-are-no-substitute-for-the-patient-fact-finding-of-bloggers/#comment-662</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Blogging is Good for Journalism. Honest....&lt;/strong&gt;

Reading pieces like this reminds me of my long-held opinion that blogging isn&#039;t bad for journalism, as seems to be the received wisdom in some circles. No, it&#039;s good for it. Very good for it. Mind you, a pack of......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blogging is Good for Journalism. Honest&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Reading pieces like this reminds me of my long-held opinion that blogging isn&#8217;t bad for journalism, as seems to be the received wisdom in some circles. No, it&#8217;s good for it. Very good for it. Mind you, a pack of&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan herrell - the head lemur</title>
		<link>http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2007/08/the-hard-line-opinions-of-journalists-are-no-substitute-for-the-patient-fact-finding-of-bloggers/comment-page-1/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>alan herrell - the head lemur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 15:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2007/08/the-hard-line-opinions-of-journalists-are-no-substitute-for-the-patient-fact-finding-of-bloggers/#comment-650</guid>
		<description>speaking of those barbaric hoards of bloggers...
http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/2005_02.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>speaking of those barbaric hoards of bloggers&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/2005_02.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/2005_02.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

