<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Communications propaganda</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2007/07/communications-propaganda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2007/07/communications-propaganda/</link>
	<description>helping people break out of pigeonholes since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:15:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Connell</title>
		<link>http://www.mediainfluencer.net/2007/07/communications-propaganda/comment-page-1/#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>John Connell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 12:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediainfluencer.bigblogcompany.net/2007/08/communications-propaganda/#comment-577</guid>
		<description>The crux is in the comms professional&#039;s definition of &#039;organizational cohesion&#039;. It is not that the contribution of the internal bulletin board stretches credibility, but that the use of the bulletin board to give employees a voice enriches the definition of organizational cohesion itself!

As Euan says, because the raison d&#039;etre of the comms person is to speak in the voice of the corporation, whatever that means, he/she is incapable of grasping what that wider cohesion - paradoxically chaotic, messy, real - might look like and sound like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The crux is in the comms professional&#8217;s definition of &#8216;organizational cohesion&#8217;. It is not that the contribution of the internal bulletin board stretches credibility, but that the use of the bulletin board to give employees a voice enriches the definition of organizational cohesion itself!</p>
<p>As Euan says, because the raison d&#8217;etre of the comms person is to speak in the voice of the corporation, whatever that means, he/she is incapable of grasping what that wider cohesion &#8211; paradoxically chaotic, messy, real &#8211; might look like and sound like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

